Subject: Re: [xsl] Checking alphabetical order|
From: Kamal Bhatt <kbhatt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:06:37 +1000
On Mon, September 24, 2007 08:16, Kamal Bhatt wrote:That isn't a bad way of doing it if you want to flag all values after the first. I need the functionality to check schema definitions, so it wouldn't be good for me. It never occurred to me that preceding-sibling would leave the XML intact (don't know why).
I would like to compare elements and determine if any element is out of
alphabetical order, for XPath 1.0. For example,
Although there isn't an XPath 1.0 operator for string comparison, XSLT 1.0 still has to be able to compare strings because of <xsl:sort>.
So you could apply-templates or for-each on the list, using <xsl:sort> to sort alphabetically, and then flag any element where its position() != count(preceding-sibling::*) + 1.
I'm not certain that it's any prettier. Because you are using
apply-templates/for-each (which conceptually does its items in parallel),
you can't stop after flagging the first out-of-order item. You are also
at the mercy of your locale as to what "alphabetical order" is. That may
or may not matter to you.
-- Kamal Bhatt