RE: [xsl] handling tags and PIs within a macro

[Nancy Brandt <nancy_brndt@xxxxxxxxx>]

I (more or less) see what you mean, dear Wendell. I
will take one file for testing. Thanks for your
explanations! 

Regards,
Nancy

--- Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nancy,
> 
> At 10:51 AM 10/23/2007, you wrote:
> >Hi Michael,
> >
> >So how do you explain the fact that those macros
> are
> >parsed properly by the XSLTPROC according to the
> >defined templates, unless the macro contains the
> >mentioned problematic items? To add more
> information,
> >I am using Docbook XML.
> 
> It's precisely the "mentioned problematic items"
> that are preventing 
> the document from being parsed, since they break the
> rules of XML syntax.
> 
> The rule here is pretty simple: elements can contain
> elements, but 
> attribute values cannot. In order to prevent them
> from even trying, 
> the parser refuses to allow them to have open tag
> delimiters ("open 
> angle brackets" or "less-than signs").
> 
> So <element><child/></elem> is legal, but <elem
> attr="<child/>"/> is not.
> 
> Cheers,
> Wendell
> 
> 
> 
>
======================================================================
> Wendell Piez                           
> mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mulberry Technologies, Inc.               
> http://www.mulberrytech.com
> 17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct
> Phone: 301/315-9635
> Suite 207                                         
> Phone: 301/315-9631
> Rockville, MD  20850                                
> Fax: 301/315-8285
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing
> in SGML and XML
>
======================================================================
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com