Subject: Re: [xsl] Processing Instructions From: Deborah Pickett <debbiep-list-xsl@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:07:16 +1100 |
J. S. Rawat wrote: > Can anybody let me know about the mistake I am doing!! Yes, you copied my untested code from last week verbatim. :) So the mistaken impression that preceding::* includes ancestors was poor recollection on my part. But I'm glad you got it working. > @pg != preceding::*[1]/@pg (I justified != rather than not(=) here because both sides of the comparison are node-sets of at most one node.)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Processing Instructions, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] copy nodes based on the crite, Senthil Nathan |
Re: [xsl] Conditional Transformitio, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping repeating elemen, G. Ken Holman |
Month |