Subject: Re: [xsl] stylesheet expansion From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:02:51 +0000 |
On 11/12/2007, Colin Adams <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's a compiled stylesheet/transformation, not a module. You have > that already with some processors (such as Saxon, unless Michael has > removed it). eh? I've been using compiled stylesheets (Templates) for years... I'm well aware of the difference. (I think I said "module" enough times didn't I?) > Compiled stylesheet modules are the facility that Dmitre requested, > and is to be considered by the working group, of being able to compile > a single stylesheet module (that's the term used by the recomendation) > and then being able to xsl:import (or include, I suppose - import is > the more difficult case) the compiled module. Have a read of: http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200506/msg00429.html -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] stylesheet expansion, Colin Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] stylesheet expansion, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] stylesheet expansion, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] stylesheet expansion, Andrew Welch |
Month |