Subject: Re: [xsl] saxon:try() From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:52:06 +0000 |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Andrew> On 04/01/2008, Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If you DIDN'T access the variable within the transformation at >> all, when should the error be raised? Prior to the execution of >> the initial template? That would be a bit harsh. Andrew> Not sure if it aids the thread, but Saxon will throw an Andrew> error for: Andrew> <xsl:variable name="foo" as="element()"> <xsl:copy-of Andrew> select="//@foo"/> </.. Andrew> ...using static analysis alone - regardless of whether the Andrew> variable is used. You mean a static error at compile time? I don't suppose Florent intended ex:error-safe to be able to catch static errors. If he did, he will be severely disappointed. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] saxon:try(), Michael Kay |
Month |