Subject: Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:12:57 GMT |
> Wouldn't > "xml-" be the most appropriate prefix here? No, such names are reserved for other use. You can call it result-xml or _xml_result or pretty much anything you like. Why trample on the reserved names? even w3c specs avoid doing this, consider xslt for example an early draft had an attribute xml-declaration on xsl:output, but they thought better of it and changed to omit-xml-declaration http://www.w3.org/1999/08/WD-xslt-19990813#section-XML-Output-Method David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda |
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda | Date | RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda |
Month |