Subject: Re: [xsl] Use of data() function From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:45:37 +0530 |
Thanks Florent for useful pointers ... I do have some difference of opinion to the below point. Kindly see my remarks below. On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: For instance > test="@married" would be an error; you should say > test="exists(@married)" or test="xs:boolean(@married)" instead. I think, as others explained, test="@married" is correctly written (Andrew, infact said test="@married" and test="exists(@married)" would result in same behaviour. As written in spec, and you also wrote in this mail, "for non empty sequence of nodes, EBV is true". test="@married" returns true if an attribute 'married' exists. Please correct me, if I am wrong. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Use of data() function, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Use of data() function, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] Slow XSLT, Manfred Staudinger | Date | Re: [xsl] Use of data() function, Florent Georges |
Month |