RE: [xsl] Easy question, big headache.

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> And I need to output some of these records, but not all of 
> them. The rules upon which I decide to output are complex, 
> and I won't bore you with the details.
> 
> Also, after every 5th record has been output, I need to write 
> some kind of marker in the output stream.

The discussion has been interesting. It sounds from your later description
as if the first paragraph above was a gross simplification: that is, the
output records don't correspond one-to-one with a subset of the input
records, which means that the first technique I suggested isn't applicable.

In this situation I would lean strongly towards a two-pass approach. It's
interesting that your code appears already to be suffering from being too
complex and monolithic; a multi-pass approach is the best way of avoiding
this creeping complexity, and you certainly don't want it to get any worse.

Your concern about the two-pass approach seems primarily to be memory usage.
This is a technology issue rather than a language issue. The fact that you
are using XSLT 1.0 presumably means you are constrained in your choice of
technology - I don't recall seeing you say what these constraints are. With
XSLT 2.0 there is a much better chance, I think, that the second phase
(interpolating the marker elements) could be done in pure streaming mode
with no additional memory requirements. It might also allow a substantial
simplification (and speed-up) of your existing code.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/