Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:ke

Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:key
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:40:24 +0200

Michael Ludwig wrote:

You must
use a variable in this case, which, of course, is unfortunate if the
node-set to search is large.

I'd be surprised if you could find a single XSLT processor that actually makes a deep copy of the full tree. A simple test with several variables pointing to the root node of several large documents shows no increase in internal memory usage compared to using only one variable per document. In other words: use as many variables as you like.

Cheers,
-- Abel Braaksma

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:key, (continued) Michael Ludwig - 10 Apr 2008 14:12:44 -0000 Olivier Mengué - 15 Apr 2008 15:42:46 -0000 David Carlisle - 15 Apr 2008 16:14:41 -0000 Michael Ludwig - 15 Apr 2008 16:19:10 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 16 Apr 2008 07:41:14 -0000 <= Michael Ludwig - 16 Apr 2008 11:08:18 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 16 Apr 2008 15:32:33 -0000 Michael Ludwig - 17 Apr 2008 09:17:03 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper structure, position(), xsl:key, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper stru, Michael Ludwig	Thread	Re: [xsl] Sorting using helper stru, Michael Ludwig
Re: [xsl] xslt processing order, Manfred Staudinger	Date	Re: [xsl] Diagramming XSLT, Torsten Schassan
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home