Subject: Re: [xsl] Question on file references From: "Felix Geller" <fgeller@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:32:51 +0200 |
Hi, I think xml:base [1] would be a possible option. felix [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/ On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Arian Hojat <armyofda12mnkeys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not sure if this is best forum for my question, > but here goes. > > I have an xml file in one directory and an xml file in another directory. > Both are the same html-like language. In this language u can do an > 'include' that gets the another xml file to create a merged document. > A merge xsl transformation is first run on a file to see if it has > other files to pull in. > > From this stage, another xsl is used to translate the merged xml file > with FOP to xslfo/pdf. > > But for image references I have to manually copy over to the directory > with the merged file. Otherwise since the 2nd xml file's image > references are relative to its directory, the merged file doesnt know > where it is. Anyone have an elegant solution to this? > > The xsl that creates the merged copy, should change the url to the > image to be relative to it and also it would be nice to copy the image > also to the new file's images directory. > > Thanks, > Ari
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Question on file references, Arian Hojat | Thread | [xsl] fallback to a default templat, Daly, April |
[xsl] Question on file references, Arian Hojat | Date | Re: [xsl] Nesting XPath predicates, Liam Quin |
Month |