RE: [xsl] xslt architecture

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All such questions are processor-dependent.

In Saxon, there should be no run-time difference between the two cases.
There are compile-time differences, of course, but they shouldn't be major.

Using imports rather than includes is probably marginally better, as the
conflict resolution for template rules becomes easier.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 22 May 2008 10:25
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] xslt architecture
> 
> From a processor's perspective: is there any difference 
> between one stylesheet containing 100 templates and 100 
> stylesheets each containing 1 template each, with an extra 
> stylesheet containing 100 include statements?
> 
> Import precedence issues aside, if they were 100 imports 
> instead of includes, does that make a significant difference 
> to the processor?
> (all unique files imported once, not the same file imported 
> in multiple locations)
> 
> I tend towards monolith stylesheets where there's usually no 
> more than a dozen or so large stylesheets, but in front of me 
> now is the complete opposite approach and I'm not keen...
> 
> --
> Andrew Welch
> http://andrewjwelch.com
> Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/