|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 May 2008 05:10:01 -0000 Issue 1511 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:30:11 +0100 |
> Equally adjacent text nodes are merged, so nested value-of's
> are pointless:
>
> <xsl:value-of separator="xx">
> <xsl:value-of select="/root/node[1]"/>
> <xsl:value-of select="/root/node[2]"/> </xsl:value-of>
>
> ...here the output is "foobar" as "foo" and "bar" are merged
> before the outer value-of gets to them.
No, that's not quite true. If you do this:
<xsl:function name="f" as="xs:string">
<xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[1]"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[2]"/>
</xsl:function>
you will get a type error because the function is returning two text nodes,
and you can't convert two text nodes to a string. Change it to this:
<xsl:function name="f" as="xs:string">
<xsl:value-of>
<xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[1]"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[2]"/>
</xsl:value-of>
</xsl:function>
and it works, because you can convert one text node to a string.
Adjacent text nodes are merged only by an operation that merges them, for
example <xsl:element> or <xsl:value-of>.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch |
| Re: [xsl] Combine two diff xmls - , Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch |
| Month |