Subject: Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-template problem From: "Greg Fausak" <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:48:15 -0500 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/6/16 Greg Fausak <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx>: >> What's a good unix xslt processor? > > Saxon > > http://saxonica.com > I normally don't mess around with java based stuff unless there just isn't any other way. I've written my share of java code. The overhead with including a java app in a distribution is pretty high. But, it looks like in this xml/xslt world all roads lead to java/saxon :-) > And if you prefer point-and-click (which I doubt you will :) It shows, huh ;-) thanks, -g > then check out Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/ > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/ > > -- Greg Fausak greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Colin Adams |
Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Colin Adams |
Month |