Re: [xsl] Better Way to Group Siblings By Start/End Markers?

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Kudos to Eliot for taking this on. While I imagine we're not going to 
see community-accessible solutions in the very near term, it's still 
good to know that someone of his caliber is working on it seriously.

In my experiments with structural induction (see 
http://www.lmnl.org/wiki/index.php/XML_Pipelining), grouping has 
proven to work well. I've also found that a first pass over the data 
can make things much easier, to iron out the kinks. A nasty 
positional grouping problem can be converted into a much simpler 
grouping problem this way.).

Cheers,
Wendell

At 08:23 PM 6/23/2008, Ken wrote:
> At 2008-06-23 17:04 -0500, Eliot Kimber wrote:
> > A Word field is organized as a sequence of w:r elements within a larger
> > sequence of w:r elements....
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
> 17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
> Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
> Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
> ======================================================================