Re: [xsl] Better Way to Group Siblings By Start/End Markers?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Better Way to Group Siblings By Start/End Markers?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:06:10 -0400

Kudos to Eliot for taking this on. While I imagine we're not going to see community-accessible solutions in the very near term, it's still good to know that someone of his caliber is working on it seriously.

In my experiments with structural induction (see, grouping has proven to work well. I've also found that a first pass over the data can make things much easier, to iron out the kinks. A nasty positional grouping problem can be converted into a much simpler grouping problem this way.).


At 08:23 PM 6/23/2008, Ken wrote:
At 2008-06-23 17:04 -0500, Eliot Kimber wrote:
A Word field is organized as a sequence of w:r elements within a larger
sequence of w:r elements....

Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.      
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML

Current Thread