Subject: RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection() From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:22:11 +0100 |
Efficiency and speed depend entirely on the processor you are using: as always, the rule is to try some experiments that are representative of your particular situation. I would have thought collection() was more convenient here, but doc() more portable. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Mario Madunic [mailto:hajduk@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: 26 June 2008 14:52 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] which is more effiecient and fast doc() or collection() > > Working on converting an XSD to SVG (will hopefully look like > TURBOXML's lovely view). I'm mainly using doc() with a regex > to parse the various directories of XSD files. Since the XSD > is built modularly and each element in its own file (I > personally do not like reading XSDs or XSLTs (for that > matter) in one large file and have to scroll up and down to > make sense of it all, but that is another > discussion) meaning there are a lot of files. So before I > test it out and spend time on switching from doc() to > collection() I was hoping for some feedback. > > Which is the better method? Which is faster or more efficient? > > Marijan (Mario) Madunic
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Colin Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Mario Madunic |
Re: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Mario Madunic | Date | RE: [xsl] which is more effiecient , Mario Madunic |
Month |