Subject: RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:26:39 +0100 |
> I guess that we all agree that the new LINQ to XML API is the > greatest thing to happen to XML for a very long time. No, proprietary languages are bad, however good they are. And procedural languages will always be worse than declarative languages for a very large class of problems. Perhaps I'm not being fair, there are millions of programmers out there churning out zillions of lines of inefficient and unmaintanable DOM code, and anything that improves their lives is to be welcomed. But they already have the opportunity to do that, and to adopt approaches that are both much more powerful and less proprietary. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Jesper Tverskov | Thread | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Joe Fawcett |
[xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Jesper Tverskov | Date | [xsl] Split with delimiter and remo, Pankaj Chaturvedi |
Month |