Subject: [xsl] Re: XProc or not XProc? From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:41:08 +0300 |
In my opinion it is a natural sequence of events: a demand of pipelining, error handling, and so on, is appearing; to answer the the demand people design extensions to xslt (functions and instructions); these extensions are discussed and standardized; XProc is appearing as something based on xslt.
Is XProc so really required?
Why should XProc be designed rather than extending (providing new api for) xslt/xquery to perform pipeline processing?
Are xslt/xquery less declarative than XProc?
I wouldn't probably asked such questions if XProc were already well established with implementations available.
-- Vladimir Nesterovsky
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XProc or not XProc?, vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: XProc or not XProc?, James Fuller |
RE: [xsl] Where is my document? loc, Marroc | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: XProc or not XProc?, James Fuller |
Month |