Subject: RE: [xsl] <Übelkeit/> - ASCIIfied element name (LibXSLT/xsltproc) From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:44:31 +0100 |
> #### LibXSLT (1.1.22) to the rescue! > > $ xsltproc ascii.xsl ascii-soll-es-werden.xml > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?> <Urmel> > <Vorspeise>Süßkirschen mit > Käsesoße</Vorspeise> > <Übelkeit/> > </Urmel> > > So is LibXSLT preferable in this respect? Or would I be > justified reporting this as a bug? > Since it has produced output that isn't well-formed XML, yes, you can report it as a bug. (By the way, do any of the SGML historians on the list know why character references are not allowed in element and attribute names? I expect the reason is just the usual one that committees are far more stupid than their individual members.) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <Übelkeit/> - ASCIIf, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] <Übelkeit/> - ASCIIf, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Validation XSLT using XSL, James Fuller | Date | RE: [xsl] checking sequence inside , Michael Kay |
Month |