Subject: Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside processing-instruction From: "Ganesh Babu N" <nbabuganesh@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:27:37 +0530 |
Thanks mike for your valuable solution. I am using XSLT 1.0. Regards, Ganesh On 7/3/08, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('page')"> >> >> I first thought that was a mistake. I always used the form >> processing-instruction(page) instead (well, the rare times I >> used it). >> But I checked in the REC and saw that both forms are allowed. >> Is there any particular reason behind that choice? > > XPath 1.0 required the quotes. XPath 2.0 allowed the unquoted name for > consistency with the new syntax element(e) and attribute(a); it was felt > that the quotes were a bad idea because they suggested to users that an > arbitrary expression could be used here, rather than a constant name. I used > the quotes because I didn't know whether the OP was using 1.0 or 2.0. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] checking sequence inside , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Validation XSLT using XSLT 1., Ganesh Babu N |
Re: [xsl] Validation XSLT using XSL, Ganesh Babu N | Date | [xsl] Windows-style CRLF in text ou, Steven Hentschel |
Month |