Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping problem. 2.0 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:26:14 +0100 |
> I didn't want the nesting (it's to move on to docbook > simplesect elements next, which need to be at para level) surely in docbook you'd normally nest sections though wouldn't you? Your expect section (or simplesect) for section 2.2.2 to be at the smae levelas para for section 2.2, that is, inside the section for 2.2. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Grouping problem. 2.0, Dave Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Grouping problem. 2.0, Dave Pawson |
RE: [xsl] Is it possible to access , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping problem. 2.0, Dave Pawson |
Month |