Subject: Re: [xsl] Result tree fragment to string? From: Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:19:05 +0200 |
A result tree fragment is not a string but it is also not a node set.
True, but I think that's just a technicality... It's an artificial restriction in XSLT 1.0 that was well intentioned but the decision was quickly proved wrong. It could be considered the biggest mistake in 1.0, especially because it was so easy to remove the restriction.
then for instance Saxon 6.5 will complain "Error at xsl:apply-templates on line 13 [...]. Cannot process a result tree fragment as a node-set under XSLT 1.0".
I think that's a "feature" of 6.5... I'm pretty sure earlier versions never complained.
Martin Honnen http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Result tree fragment to s, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Result tree fragment to s, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] Tennison-tests Sourceforge si, Darren Wheatley |
Month |