Subject: Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:36:52 +0100 |
> Please notice: [#x002d] and I want it to be - (I understand that it > is one a same thing Why do you keep posting again and again about different ways to get rid of your private [#x002d] convention for characters. the only reason that that character string is in the source document is that you have used some private set of entity definitions that put it there. If you did not do that you would not have to use regular expression replace and character maps to get rid of them. See replies going back to at least May of this year. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Unicode and child element, Tony Graham |
RE: [xsl] Unicode and child element, Pankaj Chaturvedi | Date | RE: [xsl] Unicode and child element, Pankaj Chaturvedi |
Month |