RE: [xsl] EXSLT and XSLT 2.0

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Is it fair to say that except maybe for some of the math 
> functions, all extension functions and elements in EXSLT are 
> completely irrelevant if you are using XSLT 2.0? EXSLT is 
> mostly of the past?
> 
> Have I overlooked something useful?

I think the string handling is all redundant. Most of the date and time
handling is redundant, except for date:parse-date() but I don't think that's
widely implemented. Random number generation and thr trigonometric functions
are still very useful. And as David says, there's still no dyn:evaluate().

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/