Subject: Re: [xsl] zero width no-break space to prevent tag minimisation From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:27:31 +0100 |
2008/10/16 Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Andrew, > > You've said you can't use the insert-a-comment workaround, although you > haven't said why. The comments are stripped out at a later stage, followed by more stages of parsing/serialising which cause the then empty element to use the empty element syntax... > Would the reason you can't also preclude your using a similar hack, such as > > <div><span/></div> Good idea... seems too simple :) I'm trying to think back - why isn't this the standard approach? (why do we bother with inserting comments, #160s etc?) -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] zero width no-break space, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] zero width no-break space, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] want to add node number t, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] using position() inside M, Eric Scheid |
Month |