Subject: Re: [xsl] Attributes with default namespaces? XSLT Rec question.. From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:48:56 +0000 |
>>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Mukul> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It isn't very explicit about why the default namespace does not >> apply to attributes, though. And > indeed REC-xml-names itself >> neither. Mukul> my personal opinion is, Mukul> that identity of attributes is bound to it's containing Mukul> element, so this rule seems ok to me. And I think the is the official position to. So you only have to add a prefix to the attribute if it's identity belongs elsewhere. E.g. xml:id - the meaning of this attribute is independent of the containing attribute - to discover it's meaning, you need to look at the definition of the namespace concerned (in this case it is split over more than one W3C recomendation). -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Attributes with default n, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | RE: [xsl] Attributes with default n, Geert Josten |
Re: [xsl] Attributes with default n, Mukul Gandhi | Date | RE: [xsl] Attributes with default n, Geert Josten |
Month |