Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:function vs. xsl:template|
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:44:51 -0000
> how does the experienced XSLT 2.0 programmer decide on > whether to use a xsl:function or a (named) xsl:template? Are > any performance issues involved (the processor I'm using is Saxon)? Others have commented on usability aspects, and I agree entirely with what they say. As to performance, the Saxon implementation is probably optimized to support that usage pattern. In general, function calls in Saxon are more highly optimized than template calls. For example, Saxon-SA will move the body of a function inline in some circumstances, reducing the call overhead to zero and giving the opportunity for further optimizations. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > > When trying to comprehend a stylesheet, I find it easier if > the control-flow is managed by explicit function calls. > Using functions imposes the additional "burden" of passing > the node to work on, when compared to xsl:call-template. > However, passing the node brings the benefit of making the > "context" explicit. > Being able to use a function in XPath expression also offers > a less verbose invocation of functionality. > > What are other benefits/shortcomings of either side? I > haven't found any documentation on this issue but would > appreciate any hints as to where to find some.
|<- Previous||Index||Next ->|
|Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs. xsl:temp, Florent Georges||Thread||[xsl] grouping after a group using , Friend, Darris E|
|RE: [xsl] Slow Transformation, Michael Kay||Date||Re: [xsl] XTRE1160: The fragment id, Michael Ludwig|