Subject: Re: [xsl] Scope of uniqueness of generate-id() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:16:09 GMT |
> what about using saxon:discard-document()? > > i guess it hard to persist id in this case There was a discussion a whil eback on th esaxon list as to whether that was really conformant. I think it is but you need to say that it is (essentially) like xsl:copy-of so if you call a document twice using discard-document you get (or might get) copies of the original document node. But it's all in the exact semantics of discard-document, which is out of scope for the xsl spec itself. But generate-id() is clear you always get the same id if it is the same node, but whether or not an extension function returns the same node or a copy is another question... David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Scope of uniqueness of ge, Vyacheslav Sedov | Thread | Re: [xsl] Scope of uniqueness of ge, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Scope of uniqueness of ge, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] grouping-problem i guess, Szabo, Patrick (LNG- |
Month |