Re: [xsl] are multiple predicates same as boolean and

Subject: Re: [xsl] are multiple predicates same as boolean and
From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:25:28 +0000
>> apart from this use case you cited, are all other forms equivalent
>> (which do not involve positional predicates)?
> No.
>> like,
>> X[@a='hi'][@b='hi..']
> If X[@a='hi'] matches a node, then that node will become the context
> node when evaluating [@b='hi..']
>> would be same as
>> X[@a='hi' and @b='hi..']
> X is the context node here, so the predicate will be considering @b='hi..'
> X[P][Q] is equivalent to X[P and Q] if and only if Q does not depend on
> the context node at all.

Only / will change the context node, so I would've thought one
predicate after the other is pretty much equivalent apart from cases
that rely on size of the selection (which is the only thing that
changes after each predicate)

Andrew Welch

Current Thread