Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 1 For Loop From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:39:31 +0000 |
2008/12/22 peter verhaar <peter.verhaar1@xxxxxxxxx>: >> You are far, far better off changing Xalan to Saxon... > > Yes, but that's not always an option (e.g. vendor support only xalan > at the moment) It's usually a far easier option than you think... The reasons for not using Saxon I usually come across are: - Never heard of it (despite heavy use of XSLT in the application) - Confusion with SAX processing - It's something new / yet another jar / general reluctance for change Depending on your setup, you should be able to: - swap in Saxon for Xalan without a problem - use both, but specifically use Saxon for the transforms under your control - or at worst some code changes when you use Xalan specifc features It's all really simple and often takes longer to convince people it's worthwhile than it does to actually do it. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 1 For Loop, peter verhaar | Thread | RE: [xsl] XPath 1 For Loop, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Variable issues, Alan Bull \(Local Or | Date | Re: [xsl] Variable issues, Martin Honnen |
Month |