Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: [XSL] Two "Philisophical" questions about the language From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:40:58 GMT |
> But I do also share Michael's point of view, and see > as a limitation the fact that we can have only one document element. Note though that is a limitation of the textual XML document syntax, not of the XPath (XDM) document model. In Xpath you can have any number of element children under the root and a match pattern of /*[2] is perfectly legal and matches the second of them. <xsl:variable name="x"/> <a/> <b/> </xsl:variable> constructs (directly in xst2 or via x:node-set() in xslt 1) a document with three nodes a document node / which has two child element nodes a and b. The result of an XSLT transform can be such a document node, which can not be serialised as an XML document but can be (and is) serialised as an external parsed entity. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: [XSL] Two "Philisophical", Alain | Thread | RE: [xsl] Two "Philisophical" quest, Vladimir Nesterovsky |
[xsl] Re: [XSL] Two "Philisophical", Alain | Date | RE: [xsl] Two "Philisophical" quest, Vladimir Nesterovsky |
Month |