Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical" questions about the language From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:09:48 +0900 |
Hi Ken,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:04 PM, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <?xml version="1.0"> > <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="over-there.xsl"> > <?owner jsmith> > <root> > </root> > <!--copyright notice here--> > > The root node in the above document has 4 child nodes.
It seems to me, that you are saying:
<?xml version="1.0"> is a node in XDM.
but this construct (the XML prolog)
is not represented in any form in the XDM model (so it's discarded while building the XPath tree).
Please correct me if I am wrong.
-- Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO, UBL and code list hands-on training classes: : Sydney, AU 2009-01/02; Brussels, BE 2009-03; Prague, CZ 2009-03 Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18 Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18 G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", Mukul Gandhi |
RE: [xsl] Two "Philisophical" quest, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", Stuart A. Yeates |
Month |