Subject: RE: [xsl] most efficient escape quotes? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:51:18 -0000 |
I would have though it was more intuitive to use replace(), and I would expect it's also more efficient, but there's no way of knowing without measuring it. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Koberg [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 10 February 2009 16:43 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] most efficient escape quotes? > > Hi, > > With XSL 1.0 and XPath 1.0 I had used recursion to escape quotes. > Using XPath 2.0, is the most efficient 'escape quotes' (\") the > following: > > <xsl:sequence select="string-join(tokenize(., '"'), '\"')"/> > > Is there a more efficient (fastest, least memory) way? > > thanks, > -Rob
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] most efficient escape quo, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] most efficient way to get XML, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] most efficient escape quo, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] most efficient way to get XML, Robert Koberg |
Month |