Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:namespace From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:37:16 +0000 (GMT) |
Jesper Tverskov wrote: Hi, > But the two proposals of Florent and Vladimir are basically the > literal example one more time where xsl:namespace is not needed For real-life feedback, I used xsl:namespace almost exclusively in meta-stylesheets. For example for function and template names (both the URI and the prefixes are dynamic, trying to reuse a human-written prefix, because this is more meaningful than generated prefixes). But especially for embedded XPath expressions, because we have to ensure then that the same namespace bindings are in scope in the generated stylesheet where the expression is evaluated than in the initial document where the expression appear. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: xsl:namespace, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:namespace, G. Ken Holman |
[xsl] Complex conditional-page-mast, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | Re: [xsl] Complex conditional-page-, G. Ken Holman |
Month |