Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files] From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:53:00 -0700 |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Mark Carlson <carlsonm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have found Saxon to be at least 10 times faster than MSXML and other > competitors. Just out of curiosity: Are your comparisons using the same XSLT code and between an XSLT 1.0 version of Saxon (which version?) and MSXML (which version?), or are you comparing MSXML to a version of Saxon for XSLT 2? In the latter case you are probably not using the same code in the comparison (as MSXML does not support XSLT 2) and are actually comparing apples to oranges. In the former case, could you, please, provide the exact code on which the two XSLT processors were compared and the versions of each processor? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, Mark Carlson | Thread | RE: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] creating of id and refid, Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, Liam Quin |
Month |