Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files]

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files]

Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files]
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:44:29 +0000 (GMT)

Robert Koberg wrote:

  Hi,

> I assume you mean, 'use an XQuery implementation that
> runs against a proprietary XML database', rather than
> the broadly defined and mostly non-interoperable
> implementations of the standard XQuery language, right?

  I am a bit intrigued.  In which regards are implementations of XQuery
non-interoperable? (as long as we consider standard XQuery)

  Regards,

--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files], (continued) Michael Kay - 26 Apr 2009 20:43:59 -0000 Liam Quin - 25 Apr 2009 16:40:38 -0000 Robert Koberg - 25 Apr 2009 21:37:22 -0000 B Tommie Usdin - 25 Apr 2009 22:14:03 -0000 Florent Georges - 25 Apr 2009 22:44:58 -0000 <= Robert Koberg - 25 Apr 2009 23:16:27 -0000 Liam Quin - 26 Apr 2009 02:06:10 -0000 Robert Koberg - 26 Apr 2009 10:54:29 -0000 Florent Georges - 26 Apr 2009 10:08:31 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] [xslt performance for big xml files], (continued)
- Liam Quin - 25 Apr 2009 16:40:38 -0000
  - Robert Koberg - 25 Apr 2009 21:37:22 -0000
    - B Tommie Usdin - 25 Apr 2009 22:14:03 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 25 Apr 2009 22:44:58 -0000 <=
    - Robert Koberg - 25 Apr 2009 23:16:27 -0000
    - Liam Quin - 26 Apr 2009 02:06:10 -0000
    - Robert Koberg - 26 Apr 2009 10:54:29 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 26 Apr 2009 10:08:31 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, B Tommie Usdin	Thread	Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, Robert Koberg
Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, B Tommie Usdin	Date	Re: [xsl] [xslt performance for big, Robert Koberg
	Month