Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema aware XPath 2.0 doubt From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:02:11 +0530 |
Thanks, Mike for the answer. This helps me. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, this would succeed if element x were validated as an element of type > xs:date. > > The reason is that operators like "gt" that expect an atomic value, if given > a node as an argument, will automatically "atomize" the node. This extracts > the typed value, which in this case is an atomic value of type xs:date. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Schema aware XPath 2.0 do, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema aware XPath 2.0 do, John Snelson |
RE: [xsl] Schema aware XPath 2.0 do, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] xsl: how to use <xsl:sequence, Selva Ganesh |
Month |