Subject: [xsl] Re: Combining consecutive siblings From: David Sewell <dsewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:20:15 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Michael Kay wrote: > Surely it's much easier to use positional grouping for this? [elegant use of xsl:for-each-group() omitted] Yes, definitely, thanks. Folks like me who use XQuery more often than XSLT 2.0 create needless headaches for thems Folks like me who use XQuery more often than XSLT create needless headaches for themselves when the forget about some of the latter's built-in grouping power. David -- David Sewell, Editorial and Technical Manager ROTUNDA, The University of Virginia Press PO Box 801079, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318 USA Courier: 310 Old Ivy Way, Suite 302, Charlottesville VA 22903 Email: dsewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: +1 434 924 9973 Web: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Simple grouping with XSL2, Andy Kohn | Thread | [xsl] xslt 1, node sets in variable, Joelle Tegwen |
Re: [xsl] Generate Dynamic long val, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] Generate Dynamic long val, Matthew Hailstone |
Month |