|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Use of xsl:apply-templates exception with an element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:24:38 +0100 |
> The inconsistency may seem clearer now, I hope.
Not really. It's not at all clear why you expect self::{$name} to mean
anything in xpath when {} is never used in any oethr xpath construct.
Do you find it surprising that you can't use a string valued variable in
C or java as a function name? If you have a function f in C then you
have to go
f(1,2,3)
you can't ho
x="f";
x(1,2,3)
It's not impossible to design a language with those semantics but it's
not at all usual, and there is nothing inconsistent in xpath here is
there?
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Use of xsl:apply-template, ac | Thread | Re: [xsl] Use of xsl:apply-template, ac |
| Re: [xsl] Use of xsl:apply-template, ac | Date | Re: [xsl] Use of xsl:apply-template, David Carlisle |
| Month |