|
Subject: [xsl] identity transform styles (was "Re [xsl] Change xml:lang ...") From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:58:58 -0400 |
Michael --
So you're saying that you prefer
<xsl:template match="*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
to
<xsl:template match="@*|*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
for the cases where attribute processing is minimal, right? May I ask
if that is because it's more efficient, more elegant, more XSLT-ish,
or just personal preference?
Thanks!
-- Syd, who always uses:
<xsl:template match="@*|node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
> Note, I generally use the element-only form of identity template
> rather than the elements-and-attributes form in the common case
> where all existing attributes are to be copied to the output,
> without exception: or, as here, where the exception is easily
> accommodated.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Re [xsl] Change xml:lang , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] identity transform styles, G. Ken Holman |
| Re: [xsl] XML to both ODF and OOXML, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] identity transform styles, G. Ken Holman |
| Month |