Subject: Re: [xsl] reversing dictionary in xml From: Robert Ee <eerobert24@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:54 -0800 (PST) |
Martin, Thanks for your reply. I validated both files, they should be allright now. I am working with xslt 1.0, at least I am trying. lem = the entry, contains at the top level a lemid and the entry plus grammatical category (CAT) and, optionally, grammatical information on plural (in GRAMH). meaning = the separate meanings of a given entry word, numbered with BETNR trn = the translation cluster, contains one mtrn (main translation) and, when applicable, one or more sytrn (synonym translations) mtrn = cluster which contains main translation (MTRANS) plus relevant labels and grammar sytrn = cluster which contains translations that are synomous to mtrn plus relevant labels and grammar revrk / revrs = key word needed for determining at which entry the item should be grouped. The difference in code is related to the type of translation: exemplifying sentences, which can never be a head word, have REVRS exmpl = contains exemplifying sentences VOORB and labels and the vve cluster vve = contains VVERT RES = contains a synonym of the entry word indicating the sense it is being translated, e.g. dark (obscure) obscuur dark (black) donker etc. I have been juggling with the keys a lot and managed to get a list of entries and translations, but got lost in the other details. Thanks again! Robert. This is the input: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <dictionary> <lem> <LEMID>17688</LEMID> <HEADW>obscuur</HEADW> <CAT>adj</CAT> <meaning id='BNT-19'> <BETNR>1</BETNR> <trn> <mtrn> <MTRANS>dark</MTRANS> <GRAMV>-er</GRAMV> <REVRK>dark</REVRK> </mtrn> <sytrn> <SYNTR>obscure</SYNTR> <GRAMV>-r</GRAMV> <REVRS>obscure</REVRS> </sytrn> <sytrn> <LABEL>formal</LABEL> <SYNTR>awkward</SYNTR> <GRAMV>-er</GRAMV> <REVRS>awkward</REVRS> </sytrn> <sytrn> <SYNHW>eng</SYNHW> <SYNTR>spooky</SYNTR> <GRAMV>-kier</GRAMV> <REVRK>spooky</REVRK> </sytrn> </trn> <exmpl> <VOORB>een obscuur zaakje</VOORB> <vve> <VVERT>an awkward case</VVERT> <REVRS>awkward</REVRS> </vve> </exmpl> </meaning> </lem> <lem> <LEMID>000000</LEMID> <HEADW>vreemd</HEADW> <CAT>adj</CAT> <meaning id='BNT-20'> <BETNR>1</BETNR> <trn> <mtrn> <MTRANS>strange</MTRANS> <GRAMV>-er</GRAMV> <REVRK>strange</REVRK> </mtrn> <sytrn> <SYNTR>awkward</SYNTR> <GRAMV>-er</GRAMV> <REVRS>awkward</REVRS> </sytrn> </trn> <exmpl> <VOORB>een vreemde kerel</VOORB> <vve> <VVERT>an awkward fellow</VVERT> <REVRS>awkward</REVRS> </vve> </exmpl> </meaning> </lem> </dictionary> The desired output should look like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <dictionary> <lem> <HEADW>dark</HEADW> <CAT>adj</CAT> <GRAMH>-er</GRAMH> <meaning id='1328'> <RES>obscure</RES> <trn> <mtrn> <orig id='BNT-20'/> <MTRANS>obscuur</MTRANS> </mtrn> </trn> </meaning> </lem> <lem> <HEADW>awkward</HEADW> <CAT>adj</CAT> <GRAMH>-er</GRAMH> <meaning id='1287'> <orig id='BNT-19'/> <BETNR>1</BETNR> <RES>dark</RES> <trn> <mtrn> <MTRANS>obscuur</MTRANS> <LABEL>formal</LABEL> </mtrn> </trn> <exmpl> <VOORB>an awkward case</VOORB> <vve><VVERT>een obscuur zaakje</VVERT></vve> </exmpl> </meaning> <meaning id='1288'> <BETNR>2</BETNR> <orig id='BNT-21'/> <RES>strange</RES> <trn> <mtrn> <MTRANS>vreemd</MTRANS> </mtrn> </trn> <exmpl> <VOORB>an awkward fellow</VOORB> <vve> <VVERT>een vreemde kerel</VVERT> </vve> </exmpl> </meaning> </lem> <lem> <HEADW>spooky</HEADW> <CAT>adj</CAT> <GRAMV>-ier</GRAMV> <meaning id='BNT-23455'> <BETNR>1</BETNR> <trn> <orig id='BNT-19'/> <mtrn> <MTRANS>eng</MTRANS> </mtrn> <sytrn> <SYNTR>obscuur</SYNTR> </sytrn> </trn> </meaning> </lem> </dictionary> ----- Original Message ---- From: Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 6:05:20 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] reversing dictionary in xml Robert Ee wrote: > More could be said, but I hope the example speaks for itself. Neither the input you posted nor the output you posted are well-formed. The input has a closing </wb> without a corresponding start tag. That is easily fixed. But the output has more problems, I am not sure how it is supposed to look. Consider to post well-formed samples, otherwise it is hard to use them to infer an XSLT solution. Also do you want to use XSLT 2.0 or 1.0 to solve that? -- Martin Honnen http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] reversing dictionary in x, Martin Honnen | Thread | Re: [xsl] reversing dictionary in x, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Extra spaces, Surana, Swati | Date | Re: [xsl] reversing dictionary in x, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |