|
Subject: [xsl] position() ne last() From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:43:14 -0000 |
A little coding tip. I've no idea why this hasn't come up before. It's very
common to write things like
<xsl:for-each select="para">
<xsl:apply-templates/>
<xsl:if test="position() ne last()">
<br/>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
But a much better way of coding this is:
<xsl:for-each select="para">
<xsl:if test="position() ne 1">
<br/>
</xsl:if>
<xsl:apply-templates/>
</xsl:for-each>
Why? Because however hard the optimizer works, the last() function is hard
work: it involves some kind of lookahead. With "position() ne last()" the
lookahead might be limited to one element, but it's still a lot more
complicated than testing whether the position is 1.
With streaming coming along, the latter formulation is also more likely to
be streamable (because lookahead is impossible with streaming).
I might think about doing the above rewrite automatically...
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Re:[xsl] both sorting and gro, Markus Flatscher | Thread | Re: [xsl] position() ne last(), Dimitre Novatchev |
| RE: [xsl] Group Techniques by xslt, Joga Singh Rawat | Date | [xsl] Transform with Multiple Files, Ramkumar |
| Month |