Subject: Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ? From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:39:18 +0530 |
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The use of an <xsl:function> to produce content is simple: > > B <xsl:sequence select="my:foo(bar)"/> sure. but can something like following, be simulated with XPath 2 function calls? <xsl:variable name="x"> <xsl:call-template ... /> </xsl:variable> I think, we cannot. > Didn't you know that <xsl:apply-templates> can be used in pull-style > processing? Modes and uniquely namespaced nodes should light a bulb :) I am not sure, if that's entirely correct. Working on xsl:apply-templates with modes looks to me semi pull style, and not a pull style in entirety! > Anyone (who hasn't already come to this conclusion) can find all facts > and conclude that the following is not needed: That gives me kind of a laugh :) My suggestions, may not be entirely correct from design point of view. But saying, that I am entirely wrong, amuses me (my proposal is still a XSLT 2.x feature design discussion!) :) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change conte, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |