Subject: Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:41:34 +1030 |
Although one should probably note that because of the W3C's rather cavalier attitude to maintaining standards, the question in the subject line is not well posed: The set of legal Qnames changed between XML 1.0 edition 4 and edition 5, so the meaning of \c which is defined by reference to the XML spec depends on which edition 1.0 of XML is being implemented
David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] reading a .xsv file in xs, a kusa |
Month |