Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:32:27 +0100 |
you should take a look at xcruciate, http://www.xcruciate.co.uk/ I can see some synergy between these 2 projects. J On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Alex Clark <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On the other hand, we (W3C) did not define explicit places to put, say, >> SQL or SPARQL or other syntax to configure such inputs; for my own part >> I'd be supportive of such an idea. > > Excellent, one supporter so far. :) I'm happy to help define this. > >> Having said all that, I also wonder whether XQuery isn't a better >> starting-point for mashups... not because of differences in power >> of the languages, but because of different focus of implementations. > > FWIW: We chose XSL over XQuery mainly for the ability to do schema > validation. We wanted third parties to add custom tags (similar to > extensions in XSL). Vendors could then create schemas that would ensure the > templates only contained tags supported by that vendor.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Alex Clark | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSLT for Mashups, Alex Clark | Date | Re: [xsl] Math "functions" for XSLT, COUTHURES Alain |
Month |