Subject: RE: [xsl] exslt random:random-sequence() and Math:random() From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:20:26 -0000 |
> So my next idea was to use the generate-id() function which > generates unique ids, and hack it to get a random number. Any > thoughts on this approach? It won't give you anything that could reasonably be described as a random number, but since you haven't told us your requirements, we can't tell you whether it's an adequate solution. If a bad randomizing algorithm is good enough for Microsoft when facing a b,100m penalty (see [1]), then it might be good enough for you too. [1] http://news.techworld.com/applications/3213973/microsoft-browser-ballot-not-r andom/?olo=rss Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] exslt random:random-seque, a kusa | Thread | Re: [xsl] exslt random:random-seque, a kusa |
Re: [xsl] initial template paramete, Max Toro | Date | Re: [xsl] initial template paramete, David Carlisle |
Month |