Subject: RE: [xsl] Problem of template priority From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:22:27 +0100 |
> Well, importance trumps priority. I like "importance". It's officially called "import precedence", but "importance" would have been a much better word for it! Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Problem of template prior, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem of template prior, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
AW: AW: [xsl] FO - reference-orient, Szabo, Patrick \(LNG | Date | Re: [xsl] How smart are the XSLT pr, David Carlisle |
Month |