Subject: [xsl] An approach to XSLT programming, was Re: [xsl] Dynamic variables? From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:22:00 +0000 |
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:52:03 +0000 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In your rationale you say " > > I want to remember those "style" definitions so I can emit appropriate > code when they are referenced. > > Use of temporal language like this ("remember", "when") is always > dangerous with XSLT; it's best to avoid thinking about XSLT > computation as having a particular temporal order. In the opposite case, we hear David C sometimes almost repeat the words of the OP and derive code from it? Are there ways that you 'express the problem' that make it easier to write code? Just wondering what we can learn from this idea of how a problem is expressed (above idea being on the wrong end)? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Dynamic variables?, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] An approach to XSLT progr, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] current month xslt 1.0, Szabo, Patrick \(LNG | Date | Re: [xsl] Limitations of including/, Michael Kay |
Month |