Subject: AW: AW: [xsl] 1st previous node() From: "Szabo, Patrick \(LNG-VIE\)" <patrick.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:02:38 +0100 |
Okay i then guess my book isn't right about everything :-) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patrick Szabo XSLT-Entwickler LexisNexis Marxergasse 25, 1030 Wien mailto:patrick.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel.: +43 (1) 534 52 - 1573 Fax: +43 (1) 534 52 - 146 -----UrsprC<ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex [mailto:gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Dienstag, 08. Februar 2011 08:51 An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: AW: [xsl] 1st previous node() On 2011-02-08 08:03, Szabo, Patrick (LNG-VIE) wrote: > I think that preceding includes ancestors too so you could try leaving the ancestor::*[1] out. No, preceding doesn't include ancestors, see http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/ "the preceding axis contains all nodes that are descendants of the root of the tree in which the context node is found, are not ancestors of the context node, and occur before the context node in document order"
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: AW: [xsl] 1st previous node(), Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | Re: [xsl] 1st previous node(), Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
Re: [xsl] 1st previous node(), Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] 1st previous node(), Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |