Subject: Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or append an item to a sequence? From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:25:55 +0000 |
>> <report test="@id = (//@id[not(ancestor::meta)] except @id)"> > The most > inefficient part of this is the test [not(ancestor::meta)] - it would be > nice if Saxon were smart enough to remember while scanning the elements > whether it has passed more meta start-tags than end-tags - but sadly, it > isn't. couldn't that be rewritten as: @id = //@id except (@id, //meta//@id) to avoid the ancestor walk? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or app, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or app, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] RE: Cheaper to prepend or, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or app, Michael Kay |
Month |