Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template

Subject: Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:53:20 +0100

On 09/06/2011 16:45, Stefan Hunziker wrote:

  That
XSLT 2 (or even 3) would give me easier and cleaner solutions is quite
clear, hope Microsoft will notice that once (I'm forced to use
.net..)!

Being forced to use .NET isn't the same as being forced to use Microsoft. There are at least two non-Microsoft XSLT 2.0 processors that run on .NET.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template, (continued) Stefan Hunziker - 7 Jun 2011 06:34:57 -0000 Brandon Ibach - 9 Jun 2011 12:17:55 -0000 Stefan Hunziker - 9 Jun 2011 15:45:20 -0000 Martin Honnen - 9 Jun 2011 15:51:08 -0000 Michael Kay - 9 Jun 2011 15:53:34 -0000 <= Stefan Hunziker - 10 Jun 2011 05:47:12 -0000 Stefan Hunziker - 16 Jun 2011 09:34:52 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Martin Honnen	Thread	Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Stefan Hunziker
Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Martin Honnen	Date	Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Stefan Hunziker
	Month